Do you really believe in the lies and distortions of the facts that you quote to support your Jew hating agenda. What has the latest irrelevant comment got to do with the article in question. In king David's time Palestine did not exist just like today so how could he have been a "Palestinian Jew". Both Christianity and Islam did not get to Europe until centuries later. So what. You really should engage brain before putting foot in mouth.
Red Cross: Scale of sexual violence in South Sudan is unprecedented (Reuters)
from the article: Crying King David: Are the ruins found in Israel really his palace?