I have difficulty accepting the conclusion expressed in this article. According to Zev’ Jabotinsky all who have accepted Zionism confirmed upon their acceptance that Zionism is moral. Therefore, it follows according to Jabotinsky and his followers that actions derived from what is moral are also moral, or in other words the end justifies the means. Dmitry Shumsky argues that Zionism is not immoral even when the State of Israel acts immorally since Zionism in its essence is moral. One can only conclude that when ends and means are not in sync there exists some kind of schizophrenia in a situation. As far as the Palestinian suffering is concerned Israel’s actions define what what Zionism represents. The UN Goldstone Report is an example as is the attack on the Mari Marmara.
Death toll from Yemen rebel attack rises to 55 after 10 Saudi troops killed (AP)
from the article: Erdogan, this isn't Zionism