The West Bank belongs to Israel by right of conquet from Jordan - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • GeneG USA
    • 17.04.12 | 09:07 (IDT)

    Not the UN and not anyone else can take it away or whistle it away by declaration. The current Palestinians have no historical existence on the land or ownership of the land. Jordan is not asking for it back, does not want it, back, and would not get it back if it did. On what basis should Israel give it to the current squatters? The only sensible solution is for Israel to declare the West Bank a Commonwealth and make the current residents and their descendents citizens of Israel but without voting rights in Israeli elections. This is exactly the history and status of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico relative to the US. It works well for the Spanish speaking Puerto Ricans, who like it the way it is, and it would work well for the Arabs living in the West Bank territory and improperly calling themselves Palestinians. They are not historic Palestinians, they have no roots in the West Bank, they have no legitimate claim to the territory, the UN has no jurisdiction, and Israel has a perfect right to tell them where to go. However anyone living in the West Bank who has legitimate ownership of the land by purchase still owns the land the same way anyone owns land. Moreover, ownership and oversight of the territory is Israel's right by conquest as well as historical, and evidently Israel has no intention to give it to loud mouth, grasping, fat, Arabs because they demand, nor should they.

    from the article: Palestinian Prime Minister to meet with Netanyahu Tuesday
    First published 03:25 17.04.12 | Last updated 03:25 17.04.12
Haaretz Headlines
Hillary Clinton and Benjamin Netanyahu

'Hillary Clinton pressed for an Israeli unity gov't in 2009'

'Alter Egos' by N.Y. Times' Mark Landler contains never-before published details about U.S.-Israel ties during Clinton's tenure as secretary of state.

Flags fly at half mast at NATO headquarters, Brussels, Belgium, March 23, 2016.

Turkey lifts veto, NATO okays Israel office in its Brussels HQ

Jerusalem interprets the Turkish decision as another sign that Ankara desires to normalize relations with Israel.

IDF forces working at the Gaza-Israel border, on Monday.
Mortar shell fired at Israeli troops from Gaza

No one was injured in the incident; the Israeli military responds with tank fire.

13:21 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Britain's opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn joins a doctors and teachers protest in centr

Labour scandal illustrates Zionism's main problem

The government's attempt to confuse anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism ignores the fact that Zionism can no longer fulfill the heart’s desire of the citizens of the state it founded.