The US benefits from military aid even more than Israel - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String = ''; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = ''; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = ''; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = ''; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String = ''; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = ''; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = ''; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = ''; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • zionst forever
    • 11.12.12 | 13:36 (IST)

    Weapons bought on military aid have to be made in America so more American jobs. In the 80s when the Lavi was plagued with cost overruns America offered Israel the F16 at an attractive price if it killed Lavi ( a potential competitor to Americas new F16 one day ) so they killed the competition. They offered to let Israel build F16 under licence originally but then said if you want to build under licence it can't be paid for with military aid you much buy a domestic one for that so one more order for Lockheed rather than keeping jobs at IAI. Israel has recently designed a new APC based on the hull if the Merkava 4 and so it can be paid for with military aid to save money Israel has set up a brand new plant in America do make it. Rafael & Rayathon are talking about a partnership to build Iron Dome in America so Israel can pay for it using military aid ( more jobs to Americans thanks to military aid) So lots of new jobs which wouldn't exist without the military aid program because it would be built in Israel. So military aid is a great way of killing competition from domestic markets. Another condition of military aid is at least about 90% of imported weapons ( no rules over domestically made ) must be made in America so can't take the military aid and then use your own money and buy European. Israel gets about $2.5 billion in military aid each year but it also spends more of its own money on American weapons each year than it gets in aid so the military aid is more like buy 1 get 1 free. The arms market is very expensive and the US government is not allowed to subsidise American companies so military aid they get a government subsidy allowing them to develop the next generation of weapons for the US military. Military aid is also used to buy political influence, if it wasn't for military aid America wouldn't have a fraction as much influence in Israel than it does today. About 30 other countries around the world also receive military aid. Support from Pakistan is essential in the Afghanistan war and America has that support becase it started offering military aid to Pakstan. So its something thatis used for a variety of purposes both financial and political its not just a matter of Israel gets free weapons.

    from the article: U.S. to sell Israel munitions to renew stock after Operation Pillar of Defense
    First published 11:21 11.12.12 | Last updated 11:21 11.12.12
Haaretz Headlines
The scene of an attempted stabbing attack, Masmuria checkpoint in southeastern Jerusalem.

IDF kills 3 Palestinians amid attempted stabbing, clashes

Two teens were shot dead during fire exchange near Jenin; another Palestinian who was shot trying to stab soldiers later died of wounds.

Donald Trump, with Jeb Bush in the background, following the CBS Republican debate.

Trump tempts fate by slaying sacred Republican cows

By pinning the blame for 9/11 on George W. Bush, Trump goes where even Democrats fear to tread.

EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Netanyahu realizes: there are worse options than the EU

After three months in which his spat with the European Union achieved nothing other than damaging Israel’s image, the prime minister recognizes it is time to put away 'national pride.'

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman

Welcome to the one-state club, Thomas Friedman

The most famous columnist in the world, who always reflects and shapes the mood in Washington, has finally realized that the two-state solution is dead.