The "bomb Iran" mindset is on display in Gaza - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Logios
    • 17.03.12 | 15:08 (IST)

    Rational people would say that bombing Iran is essentially a foolish undertaking by Israel. Iran produces her own centrifuges and in short order will install them in the secure under-the-mountain installation, instead of transfering old ones from Natanz. So what is the gain of destroying the Natanz centrifuges, a delay of one year? The gain of bombing is trivial, while the cost will be enormous: Missile attack on Israel, attack on US bases in the Gulf which will turn the US public against Israel, and gaining a suicidal enemy for many years to come. In addition, Iran will no doubt quit the NPT and start producing nuclear weapons as defense against Israel. But the present Israeli leadership is just too aggressive to think ahead. We saw it in the Marmara incident, when the aggressive impulse was let loose and destroyed the extraordinary friendship with Muslim Turkey. On a smaller scale, we see it now. It started with an assassination of the PRC leader, under the pretense that he was planning an attack. Maybe. If you know enough details to hit the man in a car, why not wait for him to attack and kill many of his people? The consequence of the assassination was clear to see, but the impulse to hit was too great. So now, can you see what will be happening after an Israeli attack on Iran? Yes, of course, they see it but just can't help themselves. Our aggressive leaders must attack first. Once a commando soldier, always a commando soldier and never a statesman (Netanyahu and Barak).

    from the article: Veteran U.S. political commentator: I would be shocked if Israel were to attack Iran
    First published 08:08 16.03.12 | Last updated 08:08 16.03.12
Haaretz Headlines
Obama and Netanyahu.
U.S. to Netanyahu: Sign military aid package, no better deal with next president

After Netanyahu says he would wait for a new U.S. president to reach a better military deal for Israel, American officials fire back.

00:09 08.02.16 | 0 comments
Syrians walk towards the Turkish border at the Bab al-Salam border gate, Syria, Friday, Feb. 5, 2016

For Syrian refugees, West is now worse than Assad

It was Bashar Assad and Islamic militants who butchered their families and took their homes, but the U.S., Britain and Germany left them to face their fate.

 A woman wearing tefillin prays at the Western Wall.
At Western Wall, one woman's victory is another's defeat

At annual Super Bowl Sunday prayer event, held in Israel for the first time, women at the Western Wall rejoiced in the recent egalitarian win there. But some women consider it a loss.

20:11 07.02.16 | 0 comments
Dov Yirmiya.
Israel’s oldest silence breaker, Dov Yirmiya, dies at 101

After publishing a scathing account of what he saw in the first Lebanon war, Dov Yirmiya was dismissed from the army at the age of 68.

03:57 08.02.16 | 0 comments