The first article was "significantly different" from the one that was published in Wash.Post? How, exactly? Is the true and complete meaning of the goldstonean retraction dependant on two factors: The current mood of Mr. Goldstone on a given day in his life (on monday Israel is war criminal and on tuesday Israel is found not guilty), and the opinions and convictions of the editors? It has all become a true balagan (mess). What was supposed to be a fact-finding mission and a legal analysis, has become a personal, moral and politcal farce. Now - please: tell Goldstone to write a third version and to publish it here on Haaretz.com.
Woman wounded by stones thrown toward her car near Jerusalem (Haaretz)
from the article: NY Times: We turned down a different version of Goldstone retraction