After the Gaza-Jericho First agreement (Oslo I), Israel was to give Gaza and Jericho over to Palestinian control. Arafat then started an argument: What is meant by "Jericho"? Israel thought it was the city, but Arafat claimed it meant the "District of Jericho" as was used by Jordan, a much larger area. It took months to agree on some compromise, and all this with the understanding that Oslo is a first leg towards a much larger Israeli evacuation in a peace agreement. I hope Abbas does not repeat Arafat's mistakes. Yes, he is legally correct when demanding a complete halt to settlement construction, and even in East Jerusalem, which international law forbids. But better accept some "effective freeze" which would allow only small scale construction, and move on with the larger peace deal. In return for the "freeze" concession, the Palestinians can get some good Israeli concession, to be kept even if the present talks fail, such as a larger Area A. Unfortunately, the opening declarations are not too comforting.
UN Security Council condemns North Korea launch, vows action (Reuters)
from the article: Netanyahu: Settlement building shouldn't end Mideast peace talks