An "artist" dips a Crucifix in urine ("Piss Christ" by Serano) and They NYT approves. Calls it "art" and claims it stands against censorship when Catholics complain. When Moslems react to the depiction of the Prophet by a liberal Dutch newspaper The NYT heeds their complaint because it is backed by violent acts. just what is their message here?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Clashes between IDF and Palestinians in Joseph's Tomb after Jews pray at site; none hurt (Haaretz)
from the article: NY Times: We turned down a different version of Goldstone retraction