The nuts and bolts of an Israeli attack become interesting. - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Flyboy
    • 04.02.12 | 00:30 (IST)

    An F-16 flying from Israel to Iran in a straight line would need at least two refuelings. One in each direction. This would necessitate transiting Saudi airspace. The Saudis would ordinarily contest this passage unless it was arranged in advance. Either way, allowing the IAF safe passage in both directions would be an act of war by the Saudis. Naturally, Israel would love to see a war between Iran and Saudi Arabia and the Saudis know this. For this reason the Saudis would not grant safe passage. Even if the IAF managed to pass undetected on the way to Iran, the Saudis would be waiting to meet them on the way back. The IAF would be low on fuel and armaments in this situation. The IAF tanker planes become extremely critical. Without at least two refuelings, not a single IAF airplane would return to Israel. The IAF is not experienced in midair refueling, especially at night. Other scenarios all have their own hazards, making the mission risky on an epic scale. Israel will never have taken such a risk in it's existance. On top of this, the targets are by no means undefended or easy to knock out. Even if the attack were to succeed to maximum effect, Israel's own experts estimate that it will not delay Iran's project by more than a year and likely much less. I really don't think that netanyahu would take such a mad risk, which, at a minimum witll make the gasoline buying public outraged with Israrel and will invite Iran to launch a missile barrage on Israel. No way. It is a bluff. If it is not, then we better worry about Israel making a nuclear first strike. That's how mad the Israeli government would be to make such an attack.

    from the article: Feet on the ground, head in the sky
    First published 09:35 03.02.12 | Last updated 09:35 03.02.12
Haaretz Headlines
Syrian refugees wait at the barbed wire fence, on the border between Hungary from Serbia, near Roszk

As Arab states collapse, Israel needs to take stock

Analysis | Israel is not impervious to the repercussions of the Middle Eastern refugee wave.

John Kerry testifies before the House Foreign Affairs Committee

Why we will vote for the Iran deal in Congress

Writing exclusively for Haaretz, three members of Congress explain why the nuclear deal with Iran is good for America – and Israel.

Lifejackets are seen abandoned by Syrian refugees on a beach

World wants to forget, but refugees won't go away

Four years and four million people into the tragedy in Syria, the West is finally paying notice as the victims come out of the sea.

Palestinians scuffle with an Israeli soldier in Nabi Saleh.

The 'Constraining Kids in Casts' Edition

On this week's Promised Podcast, we discuss the viral video of an Israeli soldier grappling with a 12-year-old boy; the Left's 'first-rate leadership failure'; and getting kids to take high level math.