The main problem was not "saving face" - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String = ''; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = ''; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = ''; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = ''; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String = ''; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = ''; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = ''; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = ''; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ben Gurion
    • 20.11.05 | 18:28 (IST)

    Yesterday I raised a similar question to Barel's (on the Wolfensohn forum), but gave a different answer: "It took the direct involvement of the American Secretary of State to settle a matter of slight complexity, the question of how to handle border crossings between Gaza, Egypt, and Israel. A tiny little bit of good will on the part of Israel, and an understanding that a good economy in Gaza is to Israel's benefit, would have obviated Condi Rice's results. But the Israeli government does not see any aspect of the conflict other than the military/security aspect. This is not a hopeful sign for the future." Indeed, there would have been no need for Israel to "save face", had there not been a very odd delay of over half a year in settling these issues. Why the delay on Israel's part? Israel, and Sharon, did not explain the motivation for leaving Gaza. A referendum on this issue was not held, so no real discussion took place. A Sharon advisor explained that Gaza was sacrificed in order to strengthen Israel's hold over much of the West Bank. Perhaps this is true, perhaps not. But clearly, Israel was not thinking of the Gaza disengagement in political terms focused on the PA. The disengagement was "unilateral", not negotiated - not involving diplomacy. Instead of thinking of Gaza as a model for a thriving Palestinian community, which will strenthen Abbas with respect to Hamas, and which will generate good will between Israel and Palestine, it was only the security aspect that mattered. Security is of course essential, but as the trivial details of the recent border crossing agreement show, there was little to really disagree on had the larger statesmanship issues been on the mind of the Israeli leaders. Sharon is yet to move to a diplomatic relationship with the Palestinians. And since he demands that first Hamas be dismantled, something the PA will not be able to do for quite some time (partly due to Sharon's weakening of it), one can expect, at best, some more unilateral move from Sharon, perhaps disengaging from additional areas of the West Bank. All this will be positive, but peace will only come when the Sharon era is over. Too bad for Sharon's legacy. A great warrior, a courageous man, but a non-statesman.

    from the article: And if Khaled Meshal wants to visit?
    First published 00:00 20.11.05 | Last updated 00:00 20.11.05
Haaretz Headlines
DLD conference in Tel Aviv, September 8, 2015.
Is Startup Nation fraying at the edges?

South Korea just pushed Israel out of the No. 1 spot for research and development spending. Israel needs to do more to keep up the pace of innovation.

20:30 11.02.16 | 0 comments
New Shin Bet Chief Nadav Argaman.
The challenges facing Israel's new Shin Bet chief: Knives, tunnels, and ISIS propaganda

When asked recently what issue keeps him awake at night, new security service chief replied that it’s the possibility of Hamas carrying out a large-scale surprise attack. It’s now his job to keep that from happening.

06:46 12.02.16 | 0 comments
Labor Party leader Isaac Herzog at his party's convention in Tel Aviv, February 7. 2016.
Israeli Labor Party convention demonstrates deception of highest order

Nearly every delegate at the Tel Aviv conference is happy to declare their belief in the two-state solution, and to explain why it's not yet possible.

18:45 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Haitham Saada's schoolmates stream into the banquet hall in the town of Halhul, north of Hebron.

'We're not a nation of terrorists. We're only trying to defend our country'

Friends and family describe Haitham Saada as a smart and gentle boy – and now a martyr, too. What led up to the Palestinian 14-year-old's death by IDF gunfire one Friday afternoon? His loved ones may never find out.