The main difference - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ben Gurion
    • 14.11.05 | 17:08 (IST)

    Rabin was willing to employ diplomacy, while Sharon is a man of force only. Rabin entered into the Oslo agreement, a diplomatic breakthrough. The plan, no doubt, contained some mistakes, especially since it was a multi-step plan, modelled after the Begin/Sadat peace agreement which provided for a Palestinian autonomy for 5 years. Rabin, the over-cautious man, thought this would buy him the Likud consent (which it did not). The long implementation period gave the extremists, Israeli and Palestinians alike, many opportunities to undermine Oslo. Sharon, on the other hand, has little use for diplomacy. Since coming to power he set for himself one goal only: extiguish terror. Sharon does it by force, and more force. Of course, this is not successful because the roots of the problem are not dealt with. Even when Sharon has decided, belatedly, to disengage from Gaza, he did it "unilaterally", with no diplomatic components. The Palestinians were not even required to keep the place "demilitarized". If the PA smuggles in a tank, it will not be violating any agreement! Sharon is now running for reelection. He is expected to win. If he serves his full term, there would be 9 long years of Sharon without any progress on the diplomatic front. This would be a shame.

    from the article: Rabin's angry prophecies
    First published 00:00 14.11.05 | Last updated 00:00 14.11.05
Haaretz Headlines
An Israeli soldier detains a Palestinian boy

A picture of a headlock that's worth a thousand words

Why hasn't the IDF, one of the most sophisticated and advanced militaries in the world learned a damned thing since the first intifada?

Bedouins watch as flames rise after gunmen blew up a terminal of the natural gas pipeline in Sinai.
Egypt gas find could shake up Israel's energy plans

The need to preempt Iran and export gas to Egypt was the reason the government gave to push through its controversial plan for Israel's natural gas. Now, this reason may no longer exist.

03:48 31.08.15 | 1 comments
Khalida Jarrar

Not just torture: Shin Bet also serves coffee, snacks

Trial of Palestinian lawmaker Khalida Jarrar also touched on what the Shin Bet offers its cuffed ‘guests’.

The cover of the graphic novel "Mike's Place."

Graphic novel tells story of 2003 suicide bombing

Of all the bars in Tel Aviv, Jack Baxter walked into Mike’s Place – but a terror attack would soon hit the bar and change his life forever.