The main difference - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ben Gurion
    • 14.11.05 | 17:08 (IST)

    Rabin was willing to employ diplomacy, while Sharon is a man of force only. Rabin entered into the Oslo agreement, a diplomatic breakthrough. The plan, no doubt, contained some mistakes, especially since it was a multi-step plan, modelled after the Begin/Sadat peace agreement which provided for a Palestinian autonomy for 5 years. Rabin, the over-cautious man, thought this would buy him the Likud consent (which it did not). The long implementation period gave the extremists, Israeli and Palestinians alike, many opportunities to undermine Oslo. Sharon, on the other hand, has little use for diplomacy. Since coming to power he set for himself one goal only: extiguish terror. Sharon does it by force, and more force. Of course, this is not successful because the roots of the problem are not dealt with. Even when Sharon has decided, belatedly, to disengage from Gaza, he did it "unilaterally", with no diplomatic components. The Palestinians were not even required to keep the place "demilitarized". If the PA smuggles in a tank, it will not be violating any agreement! Sharon is now running for reelection. He is expected to win. If he serves his full term, there would be 9 long years of Sharon without any progress on the diplomatic front. This would be a shame.

    from the article: Rabin's angry prophecies
    First published 00:00 14.11.05 | Last updated 00:00 14.11.05
Haaretz Headlines
Palestinian Hamas militants march in front of a mock burnt Israeli bus during an anti-Israel rally

Gaza tensions rising as Israel gains edge over Hamas tunnels

Hamas is under pressure twice over, from both the worsening domestic situation in the Strip and the militant organization potentially losing its main threat against Israel.

Ted Cruz announcing the suspension of his presidential campaign in Indianapolis, Indiana, May 3, 201

Cruz suspends campaign after Trump's Indiana win

Trump virtually clinches Republican presidential nomination; Bernie Sanders wins Indiana Democratic primary.

Opposition leader Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Opposition MKs doubt Herzog will join Netanyahu’s coalition

Herzog hasn't explicitly ruled out joining coalition, and is keeping talks on the matter from his colleagues. Herzog 'knows full well that there is a hard core of MKs in the party who will not allow this maneuver,' Zionist Union lawmaker says.

Border police photographed at Qalandiyah shortly after last week's two deadly shootings.

Palestinian father tries to make sense of two offspring killed in Qalandiyah

'Let's say she had a knife even if she had a cannon – why couldn't they shoot her in the legs? And why did they shoot her brother? Why did they kill them both?,' dad of slain 16 and 26 year old says.