The main difference - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ben Gurion
    • 14.11.05 | 17:08 (IST)

    Rabin was willing to employ diplomacy, while Sharon is a man of force only. Rabin entered into the Oslo agreement, a diplomatic breakthrough. The plan, no doubt, contained some mistakes, especially since it was a multi-step plan, modelled after the Begin/Sadat peace agreement which provided for a Palestinian autonomy for 5 years. Rabin, the over-cautious man, thought this would buy him the Likud consent (which it did not). The long implementation period gave the extremists, Israeli and Palestinians alike, many opportunities to undermine Oslo. Sharon, on the other hand, has little use for diplomacy. Since coming to power he set for himself one goal only: extiguish terror. Sharon does it by force, and more force. Of course, this is not successful because the roots of the problem are not dealt with. Even when Sharon has decided, belatedly, to disengage from Gaza, he did it "unilaterally", with no diplomatic components. The Palestinians were not even required to keep the place "demilitarized". If the PA smuggles in a tank, it will not be violating any agreement! Sharon is now running for reelection. He is expected to win. If he serves his full term, there would be 9 long years of Sharon without any progress on the diplomatic front. This would be a shame.

    from the article: Rabin's angry prophecies
    First published 00:00 14.11.05 | Last updated 00:00 14.11.05
Haaretz Headlines
President Barack Obama, July 7, 2015. What is he thinking with his Iranian strategy?

Obama: If we attack Iran, Israel will pay the price

U.S. president stressed during meet with more than 20 U.S. Jewish leaders that if U.S. attacks Iran, Hezbollah would fire missiles on Tel Aviv.

Obama and Netanyahu at the White House, 2011.

Bibi stokes Shoah guilt to pit U.S. Jews against Obama

75 years ago it was his father who rallied Republicans and railed against kowtowing Jewish leaders, writes Chemi Shalev.

A relative holds up a photo of Ali Dawabsheh in the torched house in Duma, July 31, 2015.

Calling hate crimes 'price tag attacks' is offensive

After the murder of a Palestinian baby last week, Benjamin Netanyahu declared that 'terror is terror.' Yet the way we label attacks by either side is radically different.

Writing and images were daubed onto the walls using mud and soot

Ancient mikveh found during Jerusalem construction

Second Temple-era ritual bath - plastered in Aramaic graffiti - found after a stone suddenly vanished into an unknown underground cave.