Regarding territory conquered in a defensive action, the Charter of the League of Nations (the same one which gave Britain the right to establish a Mandatory Government over Palestine and which declared that Mandatory Palestine was to be the homeland of the Jewish people) indicates that the disposition of such territory will be part of the peace treaty between the warring parties. In the absence of such a treaty, the disposition of these territories remains in dispute. Such territories should be referred to as 'disputed territories'. not 'occupied territories.' Their continued occupation by the defensive party is legal. Since the wars of 1948 and 1967 were defensive, Israel's occupation of territories beyond the 1947 partition boundaries and 1949 armistice boundaries is completely legal. The Charter of the United Nations accepts, and with no authority to change it, the Charter of the League of Nations. So the League of Nations Charter is still international law, and offers a congruent and rational balance to the 4th Geneva Convention.
Brazilian head of UN peacekeeping force in Haiti dies of heart attack (Reuters)
from the article: Preparing for the next war