The committee is a political body NOT a legal one - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '96'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '25'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Michael
    • 02.09.11 | 16:44 (IDT)

    The report of the committee explicitly states that its sources of information were strictly limited to reports obtained through diplomatic channels from Turkey and Israel. So, it completely ignored the evidence gathered by other international organizations and formal UN fact finding missions. The Committee further admits that it had no mandate or means to gather the information required to make legal determinations concerning either the facts or the law: 5. It needs to be understood from the outset that this Panel is unique. Its methods of inquiry are similarly unique. The Panel is not a court. It was not asked to make determinations of the legal issues or to adjudicate on liability. 6. In particular, the Panel’s means of obtaining information were through diplomatic channels. The Panel enjoyed no coercive powers to compel witnesses to provide evidence. It could not conduct criminal investigations. The Panel was required to obtain its information from the two nations primarily involved in its inquiry, Turkey and Israel, and other affected States. The position is thoroughly understandable in the context of the Panel’s inquiry but the limitation is important. It means that the Panel cannot make definitive findings either of fact or law. But it can give its [uninformed] view.” — See pages 7-8 The inclusion of the statement that the blockade was legitimate and the implementation complied with the requirements of international law is neither a definitive finding of fact nor law and it is contradicted by official fact finding reports from other Secretariat officials.

    from the article: Turkey President: Expulsion of Israeli envoy is just the first step
    First published 16:18 02.09.11 | Last updated 16:18 02.09.11
Haaretz Headlines
A rabbinical court in Jerusalem.
Suit claims gender discrimination in Israeli rabbinical courts’ tender

New tender says it is intended for both men and women – but requires applicants to already work for the rabbinical court, effectively disqualifying female candidates.

04:02 09.02.16 | 1 comments
Haifa oil refineries.
Israel's Health Ministry: We’ve known about Haifa cancer problem for years

Public health chief admits ministry has been aware of excess of morbidity since end of 2014; researcher presents findings into impact of environmental pollution on northern Israeli city.

03:55 09.02.16 | 0 comments
Sudanese migrants protesting in Israel.
Sudanese condemn attack on Israeli soldier by asylum-seeker

Say suspect was mentally unstable; first anti-Israeli attack by African migrant since they began arriving in 2004.

03:53 09.02.16 | 0 comments
MK Hanin Zoabi being removed from the podium at the Knesset, February 8, 2016.

Lawmakers approve 'NGO bill' in first reading

Provision requiring employees of non-profits vising Knesset to wear identifying tags taken out at Netanyahu's request.