That's not completely fair, Potobac - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '5'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '4'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Derek
    • 12.08.10 | 13:33 (IDT)

    You offer the pair of Hitler/Mussolini vs. Stalin/Chiang Kai-Shek, and you suggest their evils are comparable. Maybe. But in each pair, there's a clear stand-out (Hitler killed a lot more than Mussolini and Stalin a lot more than Chiang.) And there were clear reasons for preferring each leader over the alternatives. Stalin killed a lot, yes, but he killed mostly his own at a time when leaders like Hitler and Mussolini were meddling in Europe and Africa, threatening Western countries' interests. The Soviets never proved a threat to the West until after they got the bomb. Even Mussolini, who was a brutal and merciless politician, actually presided over a country with remarkably few executions - his brutality within his own country was not the reason for the Allies' enmity with him. It was his attempts to craft a new Italian empire, which inevitably came into conflict with Allied powers' interests, and his alliance with the demonic Hitler, that got Mussolini his reputation for evil. And take Chiang Kai-Shek. Though it's true he ended up being a repressive dictator in Taiwan, and during his time in the mainland he squandered plenty of resources fighting the Communists as opposed to the Japanese, we never actually minded that. Chiang Kai-Shek, after all, ended up killing a HELL of a lot fewer people than Mao. Mao rarely even actually meant to kill as many as he did, but it was the nature of his ideology that when he messed up his communalization efforts, millions of his own people starved to death.

    from the article: 'White Jews', not 'good Nazis': How Germany rejected Holland's settler farmers
    First published 02:04 12.08.10 | Last updated 02:04 12.08.10
Haaretz Headlines
MK Hanin Zoabi being removed from the podium at the Knesset, February 8, 2016.

Lawmakers approve 'NGO bill' in first reading

Provision requiring employees of non-profits vising Knesset to wear identifying tags taken out at Netanyahu's request.

Education Minister Bennett, who is also head of the CHE.

Bennett, Netanyahu clash over attacking Hamas tunnels in Gaza

Education minister's proposal was made during a security cabinet meeting, where no one supported it; after proposal was made public, Netanyahu's bureau blasts Bennett for trying to 'rustle up votes in superficial political background briefings.'

Residents inspect damage after airstrikes, Aleppo, Syria
Israel sees Aleppo battle as tilting balance in favor of Iran-Hezbollah axis

Though Jerusalem rarely voices its opinion on the raging Syrian war, Israel secretly prefers war of attrition between the Assad's regime and its enemies.

18:23 08.02.16 | 0 comments
A protester holds a sign advocating for boycotts against Israel at a rally. August 2, 2014

Why this liberal Zionist now supports BDS

Calling the occupation 'unsustainable' is how liberal Zionists ease their conscience and excuse their timidity, by telling themselves it can’t last. But it will last – unless we start acting more like radicals.