Building on the earlier charade, we are supposed to believe that the reason elBaredi gave the 2005 answer of a few months to the bomb was to demoralize the west. Yeah, that would work. :) We are also supposed to believe that Dr. el Baredi's primary motivation is that he wants Iran to have nuclear weapons. This is claimed of the man in charge of convincing the world that exactly the opposite must happen, and it his job to make it happen. He won the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. Next, we are led to believe that by asking for the time needed to carry out his job, Dr. elBaredi's real objective is to undermine the Willing Bombing Coalition. There is no evidence of a program for nuclear weapons in Iran. To some, that is questioning the salience of the threat. No, it is stating there is no threat. If you think he's wrong, give him a call. Maybe you could win a peace prize.
Iran deal opposition grows among U.S. Republicans, Reuters poll shows (Reuters)
from the article: IAEA chief: World must avoid confrontational rhetoric on Iran