Straw Man Argument - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Richard
    • 17.07.13 | 17:32 (IDT)

    The sensible ppl who dispute this libelous claim are not, by and large, saying that Israel would have to exactly replicate SA to be called an "apartheid" state. The comparison is inapposite for several glaring reasons, including, among others, the ability of Israeli Arabs to live with Jews, study with Jews, and attain high-status careers alongside Jews. There's also the separate issue that the double standard applied to Israel (Kurds, Tamils, and others are never discussed in editorials as victims of apartheid, of course) delegitimizes the "apartheid" standard, if one ever existed, altogether. Anyone with corneas can see that the word has been revived solely for the purpose of slandering Israel - those who draw the analogy while pretending to care about the evils of "apartheid" in any general moral or legal sense are full of it - they don't. This tiresome propaganda campaign has accomplished nothing more than reducing the legacy of apartheid in SA into a marketing ploy. You can cite statistics to say whatever you want and you can cite vaguely worded Conventions to say whatever you want. International Law does not operate on the principle of - find some general language and you're good to go. Its time the author and his like-minded malcontents realized this.

    from the article: An apartheid of hearts, minds and international law
    First published 17:06 17.07.13 | Last updated 17:06 17.07.13
Haaretz Headlines
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a tunnel near the Gaza border, May 3, 2016.
Israeli air force strikes Hamas targets in Gaza in response to mortar fire

Gaza mortar shells target Israeli forces searching for Hamas tunnels; Israel responds with airstrike, tank fire and declares border area a closed military zone; Hamas evacuates two schools as a precautionary measure.

21:44 04.05.16 | 4 comments
German Chancellor Angela Merkel shakes hands with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Netanyahu speaks with Merkel on backdrop of reported Israel-Germany tension

Der Spiegel reported that the German chancellor said she 'understands why Abbas always wants to turn to the UN Security Council.'

19:37 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Workers remove anti-Semitic graffiti from a Holocaust memorial at a former Nazi concentration camp i
Anti-Semitic incidents drop to lowest global level in a decade, study says

As reports of anti-Semitic remarks by European politicians take center stage, a report by Tel Aviv University's Kantor Center sees a drop in violence against Jews, citing a far-right focus against the Continent's migrant influx.

22:51 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Donald Trump
Trump and the Absurdity of America’s Israel Debate

He pretends to care about Israel, and the American Jewish Establishment pretends that he’s a respectable candidate for president.

21:50 04.05.16 | 1 comments