If you change the subject nothing will ever be resolved. The claimed "right of return" is a different problem. Just to help you, I suggest you take a look at the Geneva Accord, where this so-called "right" was interpreted (with the consent of the Palestinians) in a way that would bring very few refugees into Israel (less than 10,000 or so). If you ever studied Talmud you would know that interpretation can do wonders, even bigger than "splitting of the sea".
Saudis warns U.S. that 9/11 responsibility law would erode investor confidence in America (Reuters)
from the article: While Livni is polishing her wording