"Like withdraw to your sovereign territories from a non vetoed UNSC res." Really???? uhhhh I bet not. What sovereign territory do you mean.? Partition lines?????Let me laugh laudly. 67 borders????? Mmmmmmmm. It will be more and less that. Clinton proposals, Taba proposals.More and less. The UNSC will accept whatever is agreed between the sides. Law?? Well...you know I hire an accounter. he does his best to play according to the law, and tries his best to find out "wholes" on the law and does his best to prevent at least be sanctioned by the law. That's all it takes. So far veto in the Security council is part of the law, or at least it is what prevents sanctions. It's all what it takes. Non moral... non moral......uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh This is a political conflict about frontiers to be defined by the parts. SC resolutions are recommendations. If they were binding there were sanctions accompanying them.
One child, police officer killed in attacks in Diyarbakir in southeast Turkey (Reuters)
from the article: U.S.-Israel tensions ignite 'war of words' among Israel lobbies