Sounds like a strictly legal state inquiry, not good enough - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '167'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '9'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Logios
    • 08.06.10 | 21:33 (IDT)

    Israel should want to know more than what the law is: 1. What intelligence was there about the passengers and cargo? 2. What options were there for accomplishing the Israeli goals? 3. How and why was it decided that the helicopter raid method should be used? 4. Were the troops trained well for the mission, including awareness of possible civilian responses? 5. What actually happened. 6. Were the military action and Gaza "siege" legal. The commission of legal experts will only answer the last two questions (assuming they could accept the hearsay testimony of IDF investigators instead of the commandos themselves) which the "world" is most interested in, but will not be able to answer the first four, which have to do with the competence of the political level that decided on the military raid. Israel must find the answers to these questions if it wants such a clumsy operation not to be repeated, but this may hurt the politicians and they are trying to divert the public's attention. Incidentally, all the legal questions were probably raised already before the fact with the attorney general and he must have approved the "siege" and the operation from a legal point of view. Here, the political level is already protected by his opinion, so no problem for them in such a commission.

    from the article: Britain: No quid pro quo deal on Gaza blockade
    First published 21:16 08.06.10 | Last updated 21:16 08.06.10
Haaretz Headlines
Representatives of the bereaved parents after their meeting with Public Security Minister Erdan

'Erdan vowed to reconsider police chief nomination'

Bereaved parents fighting appointment present minister with reports on Hirsch's conduct in Second Lebanon War, say he promised to 'seriously examine' nomination.

Raed Al-Attar, left, seen in image of Gilad Shalit's release from Hamas abduction, October 2013.

Hamas releases new video of Shalit in captivity

In video, Hamas also claims IDF took body of Palestinian instead of that of Hadar Goldin during 'Black Friday' incident in Rafah.

Hura, a Bedouin town east of Be’er Sheva with 18,000 residents.

This Bedouin town is leaving the past in the dust

Led by a dynamic PhD chemist, the Negev town of Hura is developing infrastructure and business.

Gabi Ashkenazi

Promised Podcast / Post-Bibi Midsummer Night’s Dream

New poll sheds light peace and the occupation; some question whether Gabi Ashkenazi is the left's great hope - all this and more in this week's edition.