'Supreme Court Justice Elyakim Rubinstein had, after all, defined the test of conviction for rape on "false pretenses": "if in the view of an ordinary person this woman would have agreed to have sexual relations with a man who did not have the identity he invented." ' Do you have a problem with this definition? Or the fact that the court in this case followed it? Do you have a problem with precedent? Do you have a problem with a woman choosing with whom she has sex?
Iraq prepares troops for offensive to retake Mosul (Reuters)
from the article: He impersonated a human