someone let Ashton a refresher course in resolution 242 - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '12'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '37'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Chafeeka
    • 13.08.10 | 07:46 (IDT)

    The most controversial clause in Resolution 242 is the call for the "Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict." This is linked to the second unambiguous clause calling for "termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and the recognition that "every State in the area" has the "right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force." The resolution does not make Israeli withdrawal a prerequisite for Arab action. Moreover, it does not specify how much territory Israel is required to give up. The Security Council did not say Israel must withdraw from "all the" territories occupied after the Six-Day War. This was quite deliberate. The Soviet delegate wanted the inclusion of those words and said that their exclusion meant "that part of these territories can remain in Israeli hands." The Arab states pushed for the word "all" to be included, but this was rejected. They nevertheless asserted that they would read the resolution as if it included the word "all." The British Ambassador who drafted the approved resolution, Lord Caradon, declared after the vote: "It is only the resolution that will bind us, and we regard its wording as clear."6 This literal interpretation, without the implied "all," was repeatedly declared to be the correct one by those involved in drafting the resolution. On October 29, 1969, for example, the British Foreign Secretary told the House of Commons the withdrawal envisaged by the resolution would not be from "all the territories."7 When asked to explain the British position later, Lord Caradon said: "It would have been wrong to demand that Israel return to its positions of June 4, 1967, because those positions were undesirable and artificial."8 Similarly, Ambassador Arthur Goldberg explained: "The notable omissions — which were not accidental — in regard to withdrawal are the words 'the' or 'all' and 'the June 5, 1967 lines'....the resolution

    from the article: EU: Abbas close to accepting direct Mideast peace talks
    First published 04:50 13.08.10 | Last updated 04:50 13.08.10
Haaretz Headlines
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at a tunnel near the Gaza border, May 3, 2016.
Israeli air force strikes Hamas targets in Gaza in response to mortar fire

Gaza mortar shells target Israeli forces searching for Hamas tunnels; Israel responds with airstrike, tank fire and declares border area a closed military zone; Hamas evacuates two schools as a precautionary measure.

21:44 04.05.16 | 4 comments
German Chancellor Angela Merkel shakes hands with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Netanyahu speaks with Merkel on backdrop of reported Israel-Germany tension

Der Spiegel reported that the German chancellor said she 'understands why Abbas always wants to turn to the UN Security Council.'

19:37 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Workers remove anti-Semitic graffiti from a Holocaust memorial at a former Nazi concentration camp i
Anti-Semitic incidents drop to lowest global level in a decade, study says

As reports of anti-Semitic remarks by European politicians take center stage, a report by Tel Aviv University's Kantor Center sees a drop in violence against Jews, citing a far-right focus against the Continent's migrant influx.

22:51 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Donald Trump
Trump and the Absurdity of America’s Israel Debate

He pretends to care about Israel, and the American Jewish Establishment pretends that he’s a respectable candidate for president.

21:50 04.05.16 | 1 comments