was there too much stuff left behind when Israel pulled out and it was unfair to the Palestinians that HAD to destroy all that state of the art green houses and other infrastructure. Palestinians only wish to cite building in Jerusalem, which is not on hte table to begin with, as an example of how peace can't go forward. So I ask, WHY? As we have seen in Past, Israel can evacuate a persons from areas, it has that power over its people, even if it must use force. So then, why is this always an issue for even TALKING? Do Palestinians not like the way Israeli Building are designed? Are they not upto to code? Otherwise get the foul analogy out of your head notably: LAND IS NOT LIKE A PIZZA, LIKE CJ, LABHARAS, DURSON AND OTHER MORONS OFTEN CITE. USING THE LAND TO BUILD A CONDO, DOESN'T CONSUME IT, YOU COULD STILL DEMOLISH THE CONDO AND BUILD A MOSQUE OR WHATEVER YOU'D LIKE, OR SOMEONE ELSE COULD LIVE IN THE CONDO. LAND IS NOT A CONSUMED COMMODITY, THE PIZZA ANALOGY IS B.S.
California governor signs bill legalizing physician-assisted suicide (Reuters)
from the article: Biden: East Jerusalem plan undermines peace talks