why would one take hezbollah's side and that of an iranian president working openly for the second holocaust? 1) anti-semitism, of course. 2. arab pr is better (has israel fired a shot that hasn't hit a baby, as hezbollah rushes to the tv cameras everyday to claim, along with more tripe about arab victimhood?) and 3) most nations are worn down by radical islam's savagery, have nothing vested in israel, and care only about cheap oil. . .as for this war, israel had to land a quick knock-out punch lest hezbollah be declared the new champ of the middle east. and israel for that reason has already lost. she cannot stop the rockets reining from the north. hezbollah took the lebanese border years ago (step 1), repelled israeli attempts to maintain control (step 2), and now sets out to show that israel is no longer invincible via rocket attacks (step 3). the world may not yet proclaim that the old israel has grown helpless, but generals in tel aviv and teheran surely are taking notice.
Palestinian foreign minister filed report to ICC over torching of Duma home (Haaretz)
from the article: ANALYSIS: IAF chiefs admit air power can't subdue rocket fire