Resolution 181 is not binding - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • C. Bendavid
    • 05.04.13 | 18:29 (IDT)

    Resolution 181 is not binding, it is was merely a recommendation. The Jews accepted it, but the Arabs who didn't feel bound to it, decided that war would determine the fate of the region instead of international mediation. Unfortunately for them, they lost and Israel was admitted as a UN member within the 1949 expanded borders. By the way, Jews did expell Arabs during the 1948 war, but don't pretend the Arabs were innocent victims. 10% of Israeli Jews were displaced in the course of this war and we didn't need the contribution of new historians to know about it. The expulsions and the massacres against Jews by the Arab armies were carried out with pride. But anyway, had the Arabs accepted the partition plan, or had they accepted to renegociate it at their advantage (which was possible at the time, but they preferred to boycott the UNSCOP), they could have gotten a much metter deal and no one would've been expelled. Finally, as I said, wanting those who already have a territory to give a small chunk of it those who don't have any, so that all people's can have a state of their own is not colonialist. You can disagree with that logic, but you can't say pretend it is based on white supremacism.

    from the article: Leading Palestinian intellectual: U.S. was never a fair broker of Israeli-Palestinian peace
    First published 11:03 03.04.13 | Last updated 11:03 03.04.13
Haaretz Headlines
President Barack Obama, July 7, 2015. What is he thinking with his Iranian strategy?

Obama: If we attack Iran, Israel will pay the price

U.S. president stressed during meet with more than 20 U.S. Jewish leaders that if U.S. attacks Iran, Hezbollah would fire missiles on Tel Aviv.

Obama and Netanyahu at the White House, 2011.

Bibi stokes Shoah guilt to pit U.S. Jews against Obama

75 years ago it was his father who rallied Republicans and railed against kowtowing Jewish leaders.

A Palestinian man inspects a house after it was torched, in Duma, near the West Bank city of Nablus.

3 Jewish extremists put in administrative detention

Israel's security cabinet approved use of the measure following Friday's deadly arson attack in the West Bank.

Drying harvested chili peppers in the sun, in Ahmedabad, India.

Study: Eating hot pepper lowers mortality risk

A huge Chinese study clearly ties capsaicin, the chemical in hot peppers, to a lower risk of death in both sexes, though why remains unclear.