It is repugnant because it assumes the worst intent of a law that a Liberal Democratic government might or not declare it as a law of the Land. Segev has always assumed the worst case of any law that other democracies in the West are regarded as a legitimate protection of the integrety of their lands, and the vision of their nationality. Well, when Barack, Aharon I mean. interpreted laws according to his own wishes, Segev applauded their consequences, which in many instances went against the Legislative legal intepretation; it is only when Beinish revisited such interpretation of Barack that Tom (boy what a name!), refuse to accredit her for her legalese. Not only is the Article on the basis of self preservation of the country's sovereignty is repugnant, but it is also pompous as it makes declaration that Segev understand the meaning of the proposed law the way he sees it. Arrogance has no limit...
Reformists are in the lead in Iranian parliamentary elections (dpa)
from the article: Conditional citizenship