Relation between Terror and Occupation - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Tosefta
    • 16.07.07 | 16:55 (IDT)

    Many people mistakenly think that Terror is what is responsible for the Occupation, and if terror stops there will be no occupation. This is very false, as history shows: I. 1967-1977 The Labor party in power. Allon proposes to annex Gaza and annex the eastern 1/3 of the West Bank plus a strip Jerusalem-Jericho that will divide Judea from Samaria. King Hussein and the Palestinians refuse and want all back. Allon's party (Achdut Haavodah) is actually for a one-state solution.Annex everything. Dayan wants all under Israeli control. To maintain control, build 5-6 Jewish areas in West bank. All this has NOTHING to do with terror but with Jewish nationalism. II. 1977-1992 Likud in power, and opens up the entire West Bank for settlements. (Previously, only few settlements where Dayan or Allon thought they should be.) The Likud move is ideological. Zero relation to terror. III. 1992-1996 Rabin/Peres in control. The first Intifada (of stones) convinces them that there must be a separate Pal state and they go thru Oslo. You might say that here terror helped SHORTEN the Occupation. IV. 1996-1999 After bus bombings by Hamas, Netanyahu comes to power. Hamas here helped prolong the occupation by returning the Likud. Also Rabin's killing did. Thus Jews and Arabs collaborated to prolong the Occupation by ideological Jews. V. 1999-2001 Barak (Labor back) to finish Rabin's job. Camp David fails, but not because of terror. The Second Intifadah (terror) causes Barak to fall. Again, terror causes prolongation of occupation. VI. 2001-Present Sharon tries to fight terror but fails, and leaves Gaza. Olmert now wants the Wall as border. One can say that terror convinced the more moderate Likudniks (splitting from Likud) to agree to a Palestinian state. Thus here terror SHORTENS the occupation. CONCLUSION: The occupation was an ideologically motivated in Israel. Terror convinced Israel that it cannot work. Collaboration between Israelis and Pal terror twice caused the return of ideological Likud which wanted the occupation anyhow.

    from the article: Nothing to sell the Palestinians
    First published 00:00 16.07.07 | Last updated 00:00 16.07.07
Haaretz Headlines
Israeli security forces reach for an ultra-Orthodox Jew attacking people with a knife
At least 6 stabbed at Jerusalem Gay Pride Parade

Suspect was convicted of attempted murder after stabbing three during 2005 Gay Pride Parade; he was recently released from prison.

20:44 30.07.15 | 8 comments
Netanyahu
Netanyahu: U.S. public opposition to Iran deal growing

Netanyahu is encouraged by the fact that some of his critics are starting to cast doubt on the deal, and even to echo his arguments against it.

17:39 30.07.15 | 6 comments
A settler confronts a Border Policeman during the demolition of the Dreinoff buildings in Beit El,

Israel will never be able to withdraw from West Bank

In 2005, the state managed to evacuate 9,000 settlers from Gaza. In 2015, it struggled to demolish two empty settlement buildings in Beit El.

Woody Allen and Emma Stone

'Life is meaningless, but movies keep me distracted'

In an interview with Haaretz's film critic about his new movie, "Irrational Man," Woody Allen insists that he has always been pessimistic - but admits that he's also lucky.