Reasons for rejecting peace - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Ben Gurion
    • 01.10.06 | 20:57 (IST)

    "The real deterrent factor acting upon Israeli leaders, including Ehud Barak, Bejamin Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon, has come from within the domestic political system: They feared the residents of the Golan Heights and the West Bank settlers: - Benziman While I agree that Israel is not acting today and in the recent past as peace partner, I don't believe the reason Benziman gives for this unfortunate stance. Sharon was able to overcome any "fear" of the public in Gaza. His problem was a lack of vision for the damage no-peace can cause Israel, and his inability to control his appetite for more land. Sharon rejected Bashar Assad's request to continue the peace process, explaining to his aides that he wanted to keep the Golan. And as far as the West Bank, the "disengagement" and later "convergence" ideas were to be done unilaterally in order to keep more land in Israeli hands. I take it that Netanyahu, coming from the same non-vision school of Likud, was motivated by the same reason. The real tragic figure in the story is Barak. Barak is a good strategist. He wanted to reach peace before nuclearization of the Islamic world. And he indeed pursued peace with Both Syria and the Palestinians. The Syrian track failed because of Barak?s fear (at Shepherdstown). Barak?s weakness is an inability to understand people. He therefore did not trust himself but polls, and became fearful of the public. On the Palestinian track he also failed. One partial reason (in addition to Arafat being a very difficult character) is the way Barak related to the Pals in Camp David (refusing to meet Arafat at all). The other reason (which you will not hear cited often) is Clinton being a coward and not wanting to antagonize Israel. Clinton brought NO American offer at all in Camp David. (The so-called ?Clinton parameters? were actually Barak?s.) Jimmy Carter was relentless with his efforts to breach the gaps between Begin and Sadat, but Clinton the Coward failed exactly here.

    from the article: Is Israel a partner?
    First published 00:00 01.10.06 | Last updated 00:00 01.10.06
Haaretz Headlines
A partial view of Israel's Dimona nuclear power plant in the southern Negev desert.

Israel asks Egypt to drop nuclear challenge at IAEA

Netanyahu's advisers went to Cairo three weeks ago to discuss matter with Egypt Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, who heads effort to lobby internationally against Israel's nuclear program.

IDF soldiers in the West Bank village of Awarta, June 26, 2014.

Israeli officer wounded in shootout with Palestinians

IDF forces, accompanied by members of a police counterterrorism unit and Shin Bet security service, come under fire in West Bank town while attempting to conduct arrest.

Daniel Barenboim plays on his new piano at the Royal Festival Hall in London on May 26, 2015.

Daniel Barenboim, Israel's voodoo doll

For generations of Israeli governments, Barenboim is a tremendous find. Mention of his name is more effective than the Iranian bomb, because for the right Barenboim is the ultimate symbol of fear.

A Philistine altar from the late Canaanite era.

What Philistines brought to ancient Israel

New study finds no trace of sycamore trees, poppies and cumin before the advent of the Philistines, who evidently changed more than the region's geopolitics.