//"reason actually mandates refraining from this irreversible operation, and letting the child decide for himself when he grows up"// Why does this hold true when the parents disagree, but not when they do? Surely reason always mandates this, but when parents are in agreement there is no-one to voice the child's best interests against those who have power over him?
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Erdogan says Turkey won't broaden anti-terror law for EU visa deal (AP)
from the article: No to forced circumcision