Several issues stand in the way of an agreement, including Turkish demands of unfettered access to the Gaza Strip, and Hamas activity in Turkey.17:16 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Bill, you cite the Miller experiment as evidence that amino acids can be randomly created by a mixture of gasses. The problem with that experiment, as has been amply documented and subsequently ignored by supporters of Darwinian evolution, is that the gasses used by Miller, ammonia, methane, and hydrogen, in no way represented the gasses that would have been present in the early Earth's atmosphere, which actually were nitrogen and carbon dioxide, which do not react. The Miller experiment is completely invalid, but Evolutionists continue to cite it out of ignorance for the actual facts. Further, to say that Intelligent Design is unscientific because it does not follow the scientific process and cannot be reproduced and tested through experimentation is to say that Darwinian evolution is likewise unscientific. The fact of the matter is that naturalistic explanations for the origin of life are speculative at best- there is no evidence, absolutely none, that life arose from nothingness on early Earth. Evolutionary scientists present their hypotheses as facts thereby misleading the general public into believing that a scientific consensus has been reached when in fact it has not. There is no plausable naturalistic explanation concerning the origin of life and those who deny the scientific validity of Intelligent Design do so out of ignorance, not intellicual or scientific superiority.