What is Mr. Arens saying here? That the legal system is not the sole arbiter of what is right or wrong? Or is he saying that this particular law is immoral? If it is the former then I would be interested to know: With what would he replace the system? If it is the latter how would he propose that the law be rewritten to suit his version of morality. Remembering that once rewritten this law would apply equally to Palestinians.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Seoul: Pyongyang used money from joint factories for weapons (AP)
from the article: It's wrong to push out Israeli settlers, even if its legal