Problem with "deciding the best for the rest" - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '8'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Salih
    • 10.02.11 | 19:36 (IST)

    The problem with deciding what's the best for the rest is, maybe your rights are not their rights and what you put at top of your agenda is not so high in theirs. Generally, when you give people prosperity & dignity, even a defeat with dignity, they don't tend to hold a grudge. Let's just think about this phenomenal Muslim Brothers: Under which conditions did they emerge? What was breeding them? If you have given the people of Nile, what would they choose? Try to improve their lives (40% of them are living under $2/day. - They are still in Tahrir, because they don't have *anything* to loose, except for their lives and they themselves know that their lives don't worth a penny. - Army or police can kill them anytime anywhere for any or no reason.) So, if you were living in these conditions, would you be thinking about opening war against your neighbour? Assume these poor people managed to put Muslim Brothers as the sole rulers with a Sheriah regime, and do you think Muslim Brothers can open war against Israel next day? Or next year, or next decade, before fulfilling these people's requests? Don't forget, these people have nothing to lose. Nothing at all. Anything they gain is recorded on the plus side of the balance sheet. And when they have the prosperity & dignity in a decade, will any of them, except for a handful extremist zealots, which unless they aren't Presidents/Prime Ministers of powerful countries, harmless. At the end, if you raise your fist against your neighbour with sour relations, you'll receive fist. If your raise your hand for a handshake, hardly you'll receive a fist, as other neighbours won't want another fight in the neighbourhood.

    from the article: The Middle East does not need stability
    First published 02:17 10.02.11 | Last updated 02:17 10.02.11
Haaretz Headlines
Participants of Jerusalem's Gay Pride parade react after six people were stabbed at Thursday's march

'Jerusalem parade stabbing could have been stopped'

Gilad Erdan also condemns fatal West Bank arson attack which killed a Palestinian baby, which he says was carried out by 'religious anarchist extremists who believe country’s laws do not apply to them.'

Jewish settlers

'Jewish terrorists seeking to overthrow government'

Assailants have more ambitious aims than in the past, such as destabilizing the country and establishing a new regime to be based on Jewish law.

Funeral of Ali Saad Dawabsheh, Palestinian infant killed in deadly arson attack

Will the Israeli right finally come to its senses?

The terrifying arson attack shows us Israelis how very serious our situation is and that the path to a better future is closing before us.

A partial view of Israel's Dimona nuclear power plant in the southern Negev desert.

Israel aims to thwart bid to monitor nuclear program

Non-binding resolution could cause Israel great diplomatic damage, focus international attention on Israel’s nuclear program and prompt further IAEA action.