Problem with "deciding the best for the rest" - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '18'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Salih
    • 10.02.11 | 19:36 (IST)

    The problem with deciding what's the best for the rest is, maybe your rights are not their rights and what you put at top of your agenda is not so high in theirs. Generally, when you give people prosperity & dignity, even a defeat with dignity, they don't tend to hold a grudge. Let's just think about this phenomenal Muslim Brothers: Under which conditions did they emerge? What was breeding them? If you have given the people of Nile, what would they choose? Try to improve their lives (40% of them are living under $2/day. - They are still in Tahrir, because they don't have *anything* to loose, except for their lives and they themselves know that their lives don't worth a penny. - Army or police can kill them anytime anywhere for any or no reason.) So, if you were living in these conditions, would you be thinking about opening war against your neighbour? Assume these poor people managed to put Muslim Brothers as the sole rulers with a Sheriah regime, and do you think Muslim Brothers can open war against Israel next day? Or next year, or next decade, before fulfilling these people's requests? Don't forget, these people have nothing to lose. Nothing at all. Anything they gain is recorded on the plus side of the balance sheet. And when they have the prosperity & dignity in a decade, will any of them, except for a handful extremist zealots, which unless they aren't Presidents/Prime Ministers of powerful countries, harmless. At the end, if you raise your fist against your neighbour with sour relations, you'll receive fist. If your raise your hand for a handshake, hardly you'll receive a fist, as other neighbours won't want another fight in the neighbourhood.

    from the article: The Middle East does not need stability
    First published 02:17 10.02.11 | Last updated 02:17 10.02.11
Haaretz Headlines
Hillary Clinton

Clinton: Israelis know I’ve been their strong supporter

Republican Cruz slams rival Trump's foreign policy: 'I am the only candidate running who will rip the Iranian deal to shreds.'

Former London Mayor Ken Livingstone leaves his home in London, Britain April 29, 2016.

Most Brits say hating Israel or denying its right to exist is anti-Semitism

Only 9% say criticism of Israel constitutes anti-Semitism in a poll prompted by the storm of allegedly anti-Israel, anti-Jewish statements by British Labour Party's members.

Missing Israeli tourist Ofir Gross was found dead in Hungary.

Israeli tourist found dead in Hungary in possible murder

Two locals held in relation to Ofir Gross' death after his family members identify his body, which was discovered by Hungarian police.

BDS pin

Boycott is the only way to stop the Israeli occupation

Aluf Benn's proposal for Israel's left to establish a base of domestic support for its positions is hopeless considering the brainwashing and increasing extremism of our society.