The judge was referring to the fact that the kick was violent enough to cause damage to the testicle. The fact that the guy was being held by another policeman while being kicked in the balls was of course not relevant - possibly because that is standard practice? The policeman of course failed the service - he should have known that you must not leave irreparable signs of a beating. "Psychological testing found nothing unusual in the officer’s mental makeup." Why should it? For Christ's sake he was only kicking a goy!
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
IDF: Shots fired at troops operating near Gaza border, no injuries or damage sustained (Haaretz)