It didn't spend months making threats over Osirak and the Syrian reaction. They were targets out in the open and it just went ahead and bombed them. All the experts seem agreed that bombing Iran's nuclear programme out of existence would basically be a hundred times harder. Plus the chances of retaliation are much higher, plus America is much weaker, plus the danger to the already tottering economy of the western world is huge. You can argue about whether people should attack Iran's nuclear programme, but I just don't think it's going to happen. Do you genuinely think it is?
Russia warns of new Cold War as east Ukraine violence surges (Reuters)
from the article: Barak: Israel has not yet decided on military operation against Iran
Hamas may have told Israel it isn’t looking for another war in Gaza, but it’s clearly desperate to advance its attack tunnels. It’s also delighted to be sowing seeds of discontent and concern among the Israeli public.04:19 13.02.16 | 0 comments
Is rice more healthful than ice cream? Not necessarily. Are potatoes harmful? Not for everyone. A breakthrough study by two researchers from the Weizmann Institute shows that each of us has a different 'microbiome,' that makes us respond to foods differently. Get ready for a new medical revolution.16:31 11.02.16 | 0 comments