OK,OK, I go along with all criticisms and condemnations of Olmert, if there was wrong-doing involved. However, what I cannot understand is the fact that all these deeds were carried out more or less openly while he was serving in various official positions. Surely it is customary and imperative to be given official legal advice all the way?! Why was Olmert not given effective official legal advice against these deeds? Even Yemima Mazuz was supposed to supply advice. Maybe these so-called legal-advisers are not doing their work properly?
from the article: Fischer: Olmert, Zelekha had disputes over Bank Leumi tender