Of course post-zionism exists, namely because the goal of zionism was the creation of a Jewish state, and many regard zionism as a past relic. The state exists and post-zionists recognize the need to look beyond. In most ways post-zionism is more historically accurate than zionism since it is freed by the need to scew historical fact in order to reach an end goal. Nationalists histories are like conducting scientific experiments in reverse, in which all data must point to a certain hypothesis no matter what. Post-modern discourse approaches history in a more scientific manner; facts point to their own truths. Lastly, Shlomo Avenieri seems to be of the opinion that Palestinian and [Jewish] Israeli national narratives are diametrically opposed and mutually exclusive. This is not the case. For the most part Palestinians hope for statehood on those lands which have been occupied since 1967. There is no reason to believe someday with peace that the two narratives cannot coexist.
Saudi policeman killed in Mecca after Islamic State raid (Reuters)
from the article: Post-Zionism doesn't exist
Signatories of letter to health minister range from far right to left of national Orthodox camp.03:42 06.05.16 | 0 comments
Alleged 55 million dollar theft by a diamond dealer from the mighty and ultra-secure Israel Diamond Exchange leaves jaws agape and 12 traders facing possible bankruptcy. How could that have happened?05:24 06.05.16 | 0 comments