Obama deals a body blow to Netanyahu before they meet - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '65'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Logios
    • 20.05.11 | 21:50 (IDT)

    "President Obama has told aides and allies that he does not believe that Mr. Netanyahu will ever be willing to make the kind of big concessions that will lead to a peace deal." - New York Times// My first reaction to Obama's speech was that he was fooled again by Netanyahu. Apparently, as the NYT indicates, this is not the case. Let us then see what the speech implies for Israel. For the first time, a US President endorses the 1967 borders (up to some territorial exchanges). Even Clinton in his "parameters" left some 3-4% of the West Bank uncompensated for. From my point of view, obama's stand is very close and even better for all. Such a territory is only about 1% of Green-Line Israel, and taking it amounts to taking "Kivsat ha-Rash [Poor Man's Sheep]", as in the David and Bathsheba story. Now, the fact that the US supports the 1967 borders makes it virtually certain that if the UN endorses a Palestinian state this September, it will also specify that the state will have the '67 borders, which will then become practically non-negotiable. This is a body blow to Netanyahu and the entire settlement enterprise. If these people went to settle for the sake of Greater Israel, the fact that every bit of territory has to be compensated for by another territory, makes the whole enterprise pointless. All the other details in the Obama speech are practically immaterial and changeable. Obama is on the way to fulfilling his promise, although more by words than by action.

    from the article: Netanyahu tells Obama: Israel cannot go back to the 1967 borders
    First published 20:32 20.05.11 | Last updated 20:32 20.05.11
Haaretz Headlines
Palestinian Hamas militants march in front of a mock burnt Israeli bus during an anti-Israel rally
Tensions in Gaza are rising as Israel gains edge over Hamas tunnels

Hamas is under pressure twice over, from both the worsening domestic situation in the Strip and the militant organization potentially losing its main threat against Israel.

23:32 03.05.16 | 0 comments
Border police photographed at Qalandiyah shortly after last week's two deadly shootings.
Palestinian father tries to make sense of two offspring killed in Qalandiyah

'Let's say she had a knife even if she had a cannon – why couldn't they shoot her in the legs? And why did they shoot her brother? Why did they kill them both?,' dad of slain 16 and 26 year old says.

06:30 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Amjed Hussain and Nicola Sturgeon at the Scottish National Party's election manifesto launch.
Scottish National Party suspends party activist over anti-Israel Facebook posts

Amjed Hussain reportedly shared Facebook posts claiming the Mossad was responsible for the 9/11 attacks and linking ISIS to Israel.

00:32 04.05.16 | 0 comments
Women's protest in Jerusalem - Michal Fattal - December 23 2011
Controversy rages over Orthodox edict against female singers at memorial ceremonies

Women increasingly told they cannot sing at public events in order not to insult religious sensibilities.

01:02 04.05.16 | 0 comments