Obama deals a body blow to Netanyahu ahead of their meeting - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '85'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Logios
    • 20.05.11 | 23:41 (IDT)

    "President Obama has told aides and allies that he does not believe that Mr. Netanyahu will ever be willing to make the kind of big concessions that will lead to a peace deal." - New York Times// My first reaction to Obama's speech was that he was fooled again by Netanyahu. Apparently, as the NYT indicates, this is not the case. Let us then see what the speech implies for Israel. For the first time, a US President endorses the 1967 borders (up to some territorial exchanges). Even Clinton in his "parameters" left some 3-4% of the West Bank uncompensated for. From my point of view, obama's stand is very close and even better for all. Such a territory is only about 1% of Green-Line Israel, and taking it amounts to taking "Kivsat ha-Rash [Poor Man's Sheep]", as in the David and Bathsheba story. Now, the fact that the US supports the 1967 borders makes it virtually certain that if the UN endorses a Palestinian state this September, it will also specify that the state will have the '67 borders, which will then become practically non-negotiable. This is a body blow to Netanyahu and the entire settlement enterprise. If these people went to settle for the sake of Greater Israel, the fact that every bit of territory has to be compensated for by another territory, makes the whole enterprise pointless. All the other details in the Obama speech are practically immaterial and changeable. Obama is on the way to fulfilling his promise, although more by words than by action.

    from the article: Netanyahu tells Obama: Israel cannot go back to the 1967 borders
    First published 20:32 20.05.11 | Last updated 20:32 20.05.11
Haaretz Headlines
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Feb. 8, 2016.

Bill: Suspend MKs for denying Israel as Jewish, democratic

New version of bill replaces 'unbecoming behavior' with three new criteria for suspension from Knesset to win support of the ultra-Orthodox UTJ faction.

MK Hanin Zoabi being removed from the podium at the Knesset, February 8, 2016.

Lawmakers approve 'NGO bill' in first reading

Provision requiring employees of non-profits vising Knesset to wear identifying tags taken out at Netanyahu's request.

Jewish settlers throws rocks toward Palestinian during clashes near the Jewish settlement of Yitzhar

No one in Israel has a monopoly over radicalism

The tempo of mutual delegitimization between Israel's political extremes is accelerating. Are we nearing the point where left and right can no longer co-exist?

Venice celebrating its famous Carnival, in January 2016.
Can Ruth Bader Ginsburg help save a dying Jewish community?

The Venice community commemorates the 500th anniversary of the world’s first ghetto with events that include the U.S. Supreme Court justice in a production of Shakespeare’s ‘The Merchant of Venice.’

13:06 08.02.16 | 0 comments