Me: "On the table was an unprecedented offer from Israel (...). The Palestinians rejected the offer and showed their face then too. " OOO: "Could you tell me exactly how and when the Palestinians rejected the offer? I was under the impression that the negotiations ended because the parties ran out of time" You're under the wrong impression. The Israeli cabinet accepted the Clinton parameters and Arafat didn't approve of them -- which amounts to a rejection of the parameters. "By the way, I don`t quite see what you mean when you say that Israel is doing all the concessions. In my opinion abiding by international law is not exactly making concessions. " Was it international law to allow the PLO into the territories? Was it international law to recognize the Palestinian government? Was it international law to allow entry into Israel for work? What is your international law? To remain ethnically cleansed from territories in perpetuity?
Turkey: Reaching limits but will keep taking in refugees (AP)
from the article: Netanyahu declares 10-month settlement freeze 'to restart peace talks'
What if almost everything we know about the lead-up to the signing of the Oslo accords is wrong? What if PM Rabin never became ‘disillusioned’ about the Washington talks that were then underway? A behind-the-scenes look at the alternatives to the Oslo track.13:04 07.02.16 | 0 comments