"In a long term cease fire Hamas would get hundreds of the best long and medium range rockets the Arabs have." - S No, S, you have no comprehension of what Tosefta is arguing. First you enjoy "Argument by uninformed opinion." You argue that "Hamas would get hundreds of the best long and medium range rockets the Arabs have.If you understood that medium and long range rockets are not small, easily constructed, concealed or transported, then you would not have argued as you did. You also engaged in "Argument by Emotive Language,' you used emotionally loaded words such as "long and medium range rockets," to sway people who do not understand what the words mean, or their implications in the real world of logistics and tactics. "And your 2. to my 2.??? That`s an answer to Hamas`s throwing Fatah out of Gaza??" - S Your argument is "Agument by Gibberish" or "Bafflement". The well financed and armed by the US attempt by Fatah failed to assassinate the leadership of Hamas in Gaza.
Los Angeles police hand out body cameras to first patrol division (Reuters)
from the article: You can learn it in a negotiations course