They do not derive merely from his possession of weapons, but from the way that he wielded those weapons against Americans. Compare and contrast: this dude is **not** accused of wielding weapons against Israel, but merely that he designed weaponry. Colin is therefore correct and you, so sorry, are wrong i.e. the charge sheet only "sticks" if you assume Israeli sovereignty over Gaza.
Hello user Logout | profile
You have watched of 10 articles
Alleged assailant behind officer's stabbing in north to remain in custody for 4 more days (Haaretz)
from the article: 'Hamas weapons capability increased four-fold over last five years'
Thousands protest controversial natural gas deal across Israel
'Forget about right-left, Orthodox-secular, capitalism-socialism. Fairness should belong to everyone,' protesters say in weekly demonstration.22:22 28.11.15 | 0 comments