Netanyahu the Coward vs. Sharon the Brave - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '6'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '4'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Logios
    • 15.11.10 | 04:57 (IST)

    It is remarkable to observe how cowardly Netanyahu is, given the great example his predecessor as Likud PM, Ariel Sharon, set. Sharon came up with his plan to disengage from Gaza in 2004. The plan was opposed by many in Likud, and Sharon agreed to put the plan to a vote by the general Likud membership. The plan was REJECTED in the poll. Sharon persisted; he devised a "new" plan, which involved evacuating the SAME areas as the original plan, but in 4 stages. This "new" plan he did not submit to a membership vote. A vote on it in the cabinet expected to yield a narrow DEFEAT to Sharon, because most Likud ministers opposed it. To get a narrow majority, Sharon in mid-2005 fired Lieberman and another settler minister (and their "national union" party). It gave Sharon a bare majority (11:10) with a minimal coalition of 61 MP's, including the religious Mafdal (6 MP's) which didn't yet quit because they didn't think Sharon was sincere about leaving Gaza, but were utterly opposed to that move. Ultimately, Sharon had a group of Likud rebels opposing him, but he brought Labor into the coalition to carry out the plan. Compare this to Netanyahu: All he needs to do is fire the Lieberman party, replace it by Kadima, and govern with a safe majority that supports his "stated" political line, despite some expected Likud rebels. An astonishing demonstration of political cowardice. Note: This observation is made regardless of whether one accepts Sharon's tactics or disagrees with them.

    from the article: What exactly does Obama expect from Netanyahu?
    First published 01:33 15.11.10 | Last updated 01:33 15.11.10
Haaretz Headlines
Children wake up from a nap at the Unitaf daycare center in Tel Aviv's Hatikva neighborhood.

Asylum seekers' children in real danger in Tel Aviv unlicensed day cares

Five children of asylum seekers died in daycare centers last year, study notes; in one center, children napped on the bare floor, with no mattresses.

New Shin Bet Chief Nadav Argaman.
The challenges facing Israel's new Shin Bet chief: Knives, tunnels, and ISIS propaganda

When asked recently what issue keeps him awake at night, new security service chief replied that it’s the possibility of Hamas carrying out a large-scale surprise attack. It’s now his job to keep that from happening.

06:46 12.02.16 | 0 comments
Labor Party leader Isaac Herzog at his party's convention in Tel Aviv, February 7. 2016.
Israeli Labor Party convention demonstrates deception of highest order

Nearly every delegate at the Tel Aviv conference is happy to declare their belief in the two-state solution, and to explain why it's not yet possible.

18:45 11.02.16 | 0 comments
Haitham Saada's schoolmates stream into the banquet hall in the town of Halhul, north of Hebron.

'We're not a nation of terrorists. We're only trying to defend our country'

Friends and family describe Haitham Saada as a smart and gentle boy – and now a martyr, too. What led up to the Palestinian 14-year-old's death by IDF gunfire one Friday afternoon? His loved ones may never find out.