With all that has transpired since '67, the only way to interpret Netanyahu's oinking is to consider it as a threat. After all, the West Bank Palestinians are now at peace with Israel. Violence has all but stopped and what remains is more appropriately classified as criminal not as acts of aggression or war. So, it sounds like Netanyahu is simply telling the Palestinians, "Dare to be recognized by the world community and you'll make us angry enough to cut off your balls ." Plain and simple. Yes, the peace is not a stable one. The Palestinians may achieve a state but will remain subjugated by an occupation that steals their rights, sovereignty over their own land, their water, and their dignity. With world backing and continued Israeli aggression and oppression, and a frustrated, angry citizenry, it's easy to imagine an eventual end to world and Palestinian patience. It's up to Israel to decide how long it wishes to act in a way that in the long run places all Jews at risk--those in Israel and those in the Diaspora--for the sake of leading its people to hate, to steal and to beg for survival. So humiliating, but I guess Israeli Jews have grown used to living in that limelight.
Turkish warplanes destroy PKK targets in northern Iraq, say military sources (Reuters)
from the article: Netanyahu: Negotiations only way to achieve Israeli-Palestinian peace
The New York businessman wasn’t the casino mogul's first choice for president, but Adelson concludes that he 'will be good for Israel.'08:23 06.05.16 | 0 comments
Quality of life, sane housing prices, incredible scenery and quiet have failed to lure many Israelis to settle there, while local Druze and Arabs are still more connected to their Syrian brethren.07:49 06.05.16 | 0 comments