Got headache following your logic: If Israel agrees to a deal it must automatically be bad for the Palestinians, so you recommend to them rejecting it, promising a better deal later (on what authority? you mean after Obama, this right wing fanatic has left office?). But if Israel then agrees to this better deal, then, by your logic, It has been proven ipso facto that the deal is bad for the Palestinians, so they need to decline again, and you will promuse them am even better deal? Following this logic (if it can be called that way 2 things would happen): 1. The Palestinians will never agree to anything the Israelis agree, and thus will not achieve anything, 2. You will continue to fight until the last Palestinian.
Police disperse hundreds in brawl in Kafr Manda, northern Israel (Haaretz)
from the article: Barak: Peace process failures greater threat than Iran nukes