The content was one message. The statement that dissenters can hinder others' speech by disruption is another. The consequences of dissenting messages presented considerately is that they can be heard without fear. The consequences of dissenting messages conveyed disruptively or offensively, is that fear will be amplified. Its a repetition of the debate that has occurred for the 40 years that I've been reading about it. I think disruption is lazy dissent.
Report: Man detained at Newark Airport after entering secure area, prompting evacuation (Haaretz)
from the article: Just who is misguided?