I'd love to respond to the content of your post, but it's unintelligible. What in the world are you trying to say? Maybe try saying it in actual sentences? Are you implying that Wikipedia is the most objective source of facts available to humanity? Sorry, I prefer to get my facts from Albert Hourani, Philip K. Hitti, Yusuf Qaradawy's "Introduction to Islam," Fouad Ajami, and a host of other actual authors. Keep on being a dilettante. It'll serve you well. And by the way, why are you responding to a post I sent Nannette, instead of to the post I sent you? Because what I wrote in post 75 is so true you could't dispute it with facts, so instead you lamely resorted to the last resort of ad hominem arguments.
U.S. says working on initiative to de-escalate Syria fighting, with focus on Aleppo (Reuters)
from the article: Waqf Temple Mount excavation raises archaeologists' protests
The family had received a $200,000 ransom demand, which had not been paid, the father of one of the students said.03:22 01.05.16 | 0 comments
The explosive dilemma of 'collaboration' with the Nazis in order to save German Jews split the Zionist movement in the 1930s.00:01 01.05.16 | 0 comments