Don't be confused. Testosterone as you said yourself =big balls! *Gingko's* for memory.LOL. Let's leave that at that shall we? Recap: You said in #55 "You left out two points, laddie: Barak said immediately afterward that `Iran poses a challenge to Israel and the rest of the world.`" MV I didn't leave it out but quoted it! :) I suppose you must have missed it. Care to acknowledge? You then qualified Baraks comments about Iran NOT being an existential threat by stating: "Barak made his remarks *before* the discovery of the Iranian facility near Qum" M.V So you think it is 'new evidence'for Barak and Israel! As well as a sign that I am not applying the scientific method. Now, everyone bar 'you' knows full well that the US and Israel were fully aware of the Qum plant for several years. So, care to retract or explain how Barak did not know about Qum on September 2009? Barak has been defence minister for over 2 years. Do you think that Israeli intelligence forgot to inform him about Qum. Or are you just a little tired? I fear logic is a field you should not broach Morris, and Persian Kitty seems to think so too.
Week of floods kills 22 in Vietnam (DPA)
from the article: Obama is worthy of Nobel, he has changed the world