Moral equivalence - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • Yoram Symons
    • 25.06.12 | 12:57 (IDT)

    Why has a moral equivalence been drawn between damage done to property and the injury of actual human beings? This comparison is precisely what those who want to silence the protests wanted and expected. Once you claim that both sides are violent then both lose legitimacy. The Police Force isnt worried to lose legitimacy for a day or even a month, they are not going anywhere, but the labaelling of protesters as violent does, as you keenly point out, have the ability to severely damage or retard the protest movement. So, stop playing into their game. the smashing of a window can never, ever be compared to the injury of human beings. To do so not only reinforces the grotesque and disproportionate value placed on material possessions, but allows those who only observe the protest through the lens of the media to be comfortable in rejecting the protest movement and its values. The media, especially the media that purports to support the values of social justice, should be careful when using this word violence.

    from the article: Putting the protest at risk
    First published 03:43 25.06.12 | Last updated 03:43 25.06.12
Haaretz Headlines
Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked, March, 2016.

Justice minister pushes plan to apply Israeli law in settlements

Despite Ayelet Shaked’s intentions, right-wing leader Naftali Bennett says the effort does not reflect 'creeping annexation' of the settlements.

Jeremy Corbyn, leader of British Labour Party, March 3, 2016.

U.K.'s Labour suspends another member over Israel comment

Nottingham City councilor Ilyas Azis suggested that it might have been wiser to create Israel in the United States.

Investigators take samples, Syria, Aug. 28, 2013.

Assad used chemical arms against ISIS in Damascus

After Assad crossed Obama's 'red line' by using chemical arms, a deal was reached to see all such weapons removed from the war-torn country. Last week however, the regime used a chemical agent - most likely sarin - against ISIS.

IfNotNow activists outside AIPAC’s office in Boston

Why the Jewish establishment won’t condemn the occupation

Unless more U.S. Jews who oppose the occupation become members of established Jewish organizations and donate money, the establishment is unlikely to heed calls of those who want it to condemn the occupation.