Extremist language despite many correct observations. Moderation is a virtue, not a cop out. W/great capacity to arrive at forceful propositions of morality and state. Indecision from lack of solution-thinking is different. Creating shifts can invoke livable approaches, and a new ?balance?. (Just as you seek with 'war). Rational thought has the upper hand, whether derived from secular or religious values. Common actionable principles despite other differences with pragmatic outcomes need not be nebulous. You are correct about people jumping on new thought. Again, an argument for moderation based on consideration. What is dangerous is extremists. You cite several, but as an extremist in the opposition you drive home the pointed need for ?moderation?. Large gap between "gentle" argument and war. Why be simplistic? Circumstance dictates much. You know well elite secularists abuse power of state as much as religious. Wanting comfort does not rise to administering an entire state.
Obama to meet with Jordan's King Abdullah in White House later this month (Reuters)
from the article: Time to attack
The Israeli security cabinet has approved the plan, which would see additional workers employed in construction, infrastructure, manufacturing, agriculture and other areas.06:02 08.02.16 | 0 comments
The U.S. presidential candidate has the Democratic progressive vote in his pocket and is wise not to reveal that, on the Middle East, he stands more to the right than his fans would like him to.18:20 08.02.16 | 0 comments