Maybe the difference is that it's the government that's attempting to subvert the left-wing and its activists - while abiding, and even promoting, the right-wing - - Comment - Israel News | Haaretz Daily Newspaper
  • p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap p.TextOutput { R static java.lang.String p.mt = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; R static java.lang.String p.publicInterfaces = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValued'; R static java.lang.String p.beanClass = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.SingleValuePolicy'; RW java.lang.String value = '0'; R transient java.lang.Object _data = 'com.polopoly.cm.app.policy.NumberInputPolicy'; },ModelStore=com.polopoly.model.ModelStoreInMap
    • WeCan2
    • 24.07.10 | 10:14 (IDT)

    And blaming the university for responding to an ultimatum made by the army is NOT a valid example to bolster your claim that freedom of speech is suppressed when it comes to views from the right. Blame the army - NOT the school...even though you also must remember that his behavior, private or otherwise, still reflects on the school - just as a soldier's reflects on the military. Also, public universities, by their very nature, tend to be reservoirs of the progressive and enlightened thought - often conflicting with the mainstream - that you refer to as "left-wing". This in itself allows for the tendency of them being less receptive to views that conflict with the prevailing thought existing within them. No different than private schools with right wing agendas, or religious schools. Bottom line, the university and its members don't have a problem with ANYONE exercising their freedom of speech - the problem lies with someone using IT as a forum for expressing views that it deems contrary or inappropriate. Meanwhile, what makes the "threat" - which you attempt to discount - very real, is that it's part of a much wider effort emanating from within the 'government' to subvert ALL forms of protest and activism that is contrary to its agenda...whether in the academic arena or not. The threat is real, and your argument that's not is moot.

    from the article: Just who's threatening whom?
    First published 13:43 23.07.10 | Last updated 13:43 23.07.10
Haaretz Headlines
A partial view of Israel's Dimona nuclear power plant in the southern Negev desert.

Israel asks Egypt to drop nuclear challenge at IAEA

Netanyahu's advisers went to Cairo three weeks ago to discuss matter with Egypt Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry, who heads effort to lobby internationally against Israel's nuclear program.

IDF soldiers in the West Bank village of Awarta, June 26, 2014.

Israeli officer wounded in shootout with Palestinians

IDF forces, accompanied by members of a police counterterrorism unit and Shin Bet security service, come under fire in West Bank town while attempting to conduct arrest.

Daniel Barenboim plays on his new piano at the Royal Festival Hall in London on May 26, 2015.

Daniel Barenboim, Israel's voodoo doll

For generations of Israeli governments, Barenboim is a tremendous find. Mention of his name is more effective than the Iranian bomb, because for the right Barenboim is the ultimate symbol of fear.

A Philistine altar from the late Canaanite era.

What Philistines brought to ancient Israel

New study finds no trace of sycamore trees, poppies and cumin before the advent of the Philistines, who evidently changed more than the region's geopolitics.